Should the Bible be taken literally, or must all of it be spiritually interpreted?
Is there good in the literal renderings and are they elevated by the Spirit?
Or is the literal simply the "dead letter" and evil?
What do you think?
ok; watch this answer
it cannot be spiritally interpited by those without the spirit
and yet; the bible contains the words that leads one to the story of Jesus and then life
MY CONCLUSION the bible is not a book of spiritual interpitations
the two terms that should be used are
literal and allegorical allegorical is not un-truth ; myth or any other such inclanation towards being unreal
example ;
if one should say i only believe what i see
then play them a song and let them look for the sound
see what i mean? Jesus is a door does jesus have a knob? is Jesus attached to side walls? -------------literal
a literal mind (only) cannot see this
BUT; we all use that allegorical part of our mind to see
see the door ( Jesus) is the way to something else -------------------allegorical
note the door in both; allegorical uses the liternal door and combines the uses of said literal door and creates a "word-picture" to express what makes Jesus a door
see what i mean?; if not make me say it again
the literal readings ( each verse) are but the ingredients
who would pull flour out of the container and serve it as cake?
watch again ; as we explore a parable
literal; -----------------------you are the light
literal; ---------------------- the word is the light
literal; ---------------------- the holy spirit comes to dwell in you
literal; ---------------------- the father son and holy ghost are one
the allegorical ; ------------ jesus is the light ; jesus is one with the holy spirit ; when the holy spirit comes to dwell --------------------------------within you ; that holy spirit is the light within you
this is quite different than a said spirtualized interpitation or what other have drawn out from just the literal reading
do you see the breakfast?
look at those literals again ; bread; eggs; potatoes; and a meat
it is the allegorical that cooked them into what we call a meal
see what i mean ? if not make me say it again
on cf ff ; i did the parable of the sower
i showed that if you read the parable from any of the gosples
you have the literal but incompleted story
mark has a line that is not in the others
mark and luke have a line not in matthew
who went to the market matthew ; bob and i went to the market at noon
luke ; jake and i went to the market at noon
mark ; i went to the market with luke at noon
so read each version and then tell me ;
who went to the market? the complete answer is ; matthew ; luke ; mark ; bob; and jake
but taking just one of the versions you don't get the complete story
see what i mean? if not make me say it again
Or is the literal simply the "dead letter" and evil? no; it isn't evil or wrong ;
it is an ingredient
the casual ( believer or unbeliever) can see the flour or eggs or potatoes ( the ingredents )
the true follower ( believer ) will kept going till he sees the breakfast
================================================
the literal (each verse) needs to be fixed into ( cooked/pondered) the whole story ( the meal).